« Profiles In IT Leadership: Paul English of 3TIER | Main | Harris: What It Takes To Build A Trusted Cloud »

June 22, 2011


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Of VMAX and VNX:



Nice write-up. In addition to the example you give above, I think a reason VMAX is a better fit for some organizations is the criticality of the workload and the SLA's involved.

As reliable as the mid-tier arrays are these days, for some it comes down to whether you are able to tolerate that extra "nine" of downtime or performance degradation. Nines are algorithmically expensive, so only your business can determine what one is worth.

doug vibbert

Hey chuck, sorry to be late to the party but I thought the vnx was more scalable than two controllers. The reason I'm seeing where I work looking to the vnx is the simplicity of administration. People are considered the limiting factor. I'm hoping you mention here that the vmax is much more easily managed..

The comments to this entry are closed.

Chuck Hollis

  • Chuck Hollis
    Chief Strategist, VMware SAS BU

    Chuck has recently joined VMware in a new role, and is quite enthused!

    Previously, he was with EMC for 18 years, most of them great.

    He enjoys speaking to customer and industry audiences about a variety of technology topics, and -- of course -- enjoys blogging.

    Chuck lives in Holliston, MA with his wife, three kids and four dogs when he's not travelling. In his spare time, Chuck is working on his second career as an aging rock musician.

    Warning: do not buy him a drink when there is a piano nearby.
Enter your Email:
Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

General Housekeeping

  • Frequency of Updates
    I try and write something new 1-2 times per week; less if I'm travelling, more if I'm in the office. Hopefully you'll find the frequency about right!
  • Comments and Feedback
    All courteous comments welcome. TypePad occasionally puts comments into the spam folder, but I'll fish them out. Thanks!